Wednesday, October 22, 2014

The Apostle Peter and the Last Supper (2012)

I’m seeing a lot of Pure Flix movies lately.  Mostly because they all seem to be on Netflix (and therefore free), but also because I’ve enjoyed at least a few of them.  They seem to have a decent budget, and the writing is not half bad, so I’ve been sticking with them.  There are some really bad ones (The Book of Ruth comes to mind), but also some more solid ones.

“More solid” being a relative term compared to most Christian movies.  They seem to all be at least problematic theological.  At worst, they succumb to bad TBN theology (Ruth).  At best they are just misguided (usually in eschatology and in Gospel presentation).

Peter, on the other hand, is actually pretty good.  Now, as with some of their other films, Jesus does appear on the screen, which is something that these movies do without even really considering the properness of it in light of the second commandment.  That being said, and this is something I’ve said before, I’m not going to review that point, because I haven’t studied it enough to really make a case on whether Jesus should appear in movies yet.  I hope to research that a bit more and do a blanket post that I can reference for any film that portrays the God-man. 

The flow of the thing

The whole plot is that Peter is in a Roman prison, awaiting his execution.  One of the guards takes an interest in him and asks about Jesus and why Peter should want to die for this man?

Peter tells him about episodes in Jesus’ life, culminating in the Last Supper, which takes a good part of the film (actually too much of the film) to tell.  At last the point of it is told – that Jesus is the perfect sacrifice for sins, and that we can be forgiven by God because of His work on the cross.

The idea is a good one, and it is well done.  We are told the story of Christ without the movie being yet another film version of the story of Christ.  We see it from a different angle, and it is good. 

The changing of things

What I don’t understand is why certain things are changed.  For example, Jesus renames Simon on their first meeting, and then asks who people say that He is.  Wait a minute, because in Scripture, this happens later, and Jesus says to Simon, “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it,” because of his confession that Jesus is the Christ, not before.  This is such a strange flip of the story, and I don’t see the point in it.  They could have easily kept the parts with Jesus exactly the way they are told in the Bible.  Obviously, the jail scenes will be fiction, but why change what is in Scripture?

Forgiveness

The second major problem, and a very big problem with it, is the question of who does Jesus forgive?  Peter says that Jesus forgave Judas, but Judas refused the forgiveness.  Apparently, that is the reason that Judas is in Hell, because he refused the forgiveness of Jesus.

Now, I think we need to look at this carefully, because there is an important point here.  I recently heard someone mocking the doctrine of hell, and he did so by saying that Christians believe that God is incredibly insecure, and He loves us all, but if you say “No, thanks,” then He gets mad and throws you into everlasting torment for daring to refuse His love.

Well, that’s not what Christians actually believe, but it really seems that way when we are hearing things like this.  The theology of this movie is very close to that strawman – Jesus has forgiven everyone, but you have to accept His forgiveness, otherwise you go to hell.  Um, what exactly will the person be punished for in hell in that system?  The sin of refusing forgiveness?  And, if I may be cheeky here, was that sin forgiven too, or is that the only sin that God doesn’t just sweep under the rug?

Let me be clear – the sacrifice of Christ was enough to cover the sin of Judas.  It was enough for my sin, and it would have been enough for Judas, Pilot, Herod, and all the Jews calling for His death too.  But that is not to say that they were forgiven.  We are forgiven when we are brought to repentance and faith by the Spirit and united to Christ in His death.  We are then adopted as sons and daughters of the Father, cleansed from our sin and made righteous in Christ.

And it makes it worse when the filmmakers have foreign theology come out of the mouth of Peter and Jesus.  You know, some quack says something goofy in one of their end times movies, and we just shake our head and think, “Yeah, that guy doesn’t have his theology together,” but in cases like these, there is a change in Christian theology, and they put that change into the mouth of an apostle.  That should bother us.  I mean, the change here is probably an honest misunderstanding, so it shouldn’t bother us as much as the movie Noah should, where the change to Scripture was intentional and wicked, but we should be striving for better.

Does it matter?

I mean, who cares when they are just trying to make a good movie to spread the Gospel.  Well, for one, that guy I heard strawmanning the doctrine of Hell may really believe that’s what the doctrine is.  Where did he get that idea?  It was from presentations like this one.  Probably not this one, but one much like it.

So many objections to the faith and so many cases of mocking of the faith are coming out of a misunderstanding of the faith.  Good intentioned people who don’t know what they are talking about try to give answers when they should be saying, “I’m not sure, but let me find out and get back to you.”  We are so scared of theology because we think that it is either unimportant or that it just divides people, but it’s quite the opposite.  When that guy mocks hell, this movie can give no answer to him, but I can.  Not because I’m really smart or witty, but because I’ve studied the theology.

Secondly, it portrays our God as incompetent.  Jesus in this theology tries to save everyone and fails most of the time.  On the contrary, Scripture tells us, “And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day.  For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.”

Jesus loses none that He seeks to save.  He did not forgive Judas, because it was not His intention to save Judas.  But for those among His sheep, He does not lose a single one.  All will be perfected in Him.

Conclusion

As a film, it was pretty good.  Theologically, not really bad.  This is a film I wouldn’t mind showing an unbeliever as a starting point of discussion if the situation were right for it, though it may not be my first choice in approaches.